|
Engineered Lifting Current Case
Study
June 16,
2009
Magnetek Static Simulation
Bridge Control
Let’s face it, everyone loves Magnetek variable
frequency control. Whether it’s for a hoist,
trolley, or bridge motion, everyone likes the
managed and controlled ramp-up/ramp-down that
variable frequency provides, not to mention the
benefits from reduced mechanical parts wear.
But there is one person in a plant that does not
like standard variable frequency control on his
bridge, and that’s the crane cab operator. The
crane cab operator wants to be able to control
the performance of the crane, and does not like
a linear rate of acceleration and deceleration.

You have to go back in crane history to
understand why a Scalar drive, especially for
the bridge motion, is not the most desirable.
Original overhead cranes used DC motors for all
motions. These motors/controls gave the operator
torque control over the bridge and trolley
motions, and allowed for plugging of either
motion, inducing a motor field to provide
torque/speed control of that motion. If the
bridge had a hydraulic brake in the cab, chances
were it was seldom used, unless in emergency
stops.
DC motors became expensive and DC power less
available compared to AC motors and AC power (AC
versus DC war). However, operators still wanted
the torque control that DC had provided. So
control manufacturers developed AC controls,
such as Static Stepless to provide the “seat of
the pants” control that the operators wanted,
and needed.

But as before, the AC wound rotor motor has
become expensive, less available, and
maintenance intensive compared to the new AC
squirrel cage motors that can be used with a VFD
control. The application of squirrel cage motors
with variable frequency control is great, but
the operator loses dynamic control of the crane,
critical in some operations.

The above is a typical acceleration/deceleration
chart, showing the managed rates in time and
hertz.
In order to provide dynamic control of the
bridge and trolley motions, Magnetek has
developed and patented “Static Simulation” for
their variable frequency controls, allowing the
operator to have torque based control of these
motions instead of time based.
In a static output from the cab (potentiometer),
this is a true application of motor field,
increasing or decreasing motor torque on
operator demand.
In a stepped configuration (detented control)
the speed points can be programmed such as:
1st Speed Point - 50% motor torque at 6 hertz
2nd Speed Point – 75% motor torque at 12 hertz
3rd Speed Point – 75% motor torque at 24 hertz
etc….
Static Simulation from Magnetek can change your
crane from linear time based bridge and trolley
to dynamic torque based control, typically using
the existing motor and brake. This control uses
a typical 1024 PPR encoder, a Magnetek VG+
drive, and resistors sized for your specific
duty cycle. Motor full load amps in our
applications are never exceeded, even at 100%
full motor torque!

Typical crane cab with J. R. Merritt cab seat
with built-in joystick control and Magnetek
Static Simulation control
If you have a cab controlled crane, and have
been wanting to change over to variable
frequency, or you have variable frequency and
are unhappy with the response, give Eric Brown
at Engineered Lifting Systems a call to check
into Magnetek Static Simulation!
If you have questions on
Gorbel or any of the equipment shown above, make
sure to contact the Crane Doctor, Eric Brown at
sales@engineeredlifting.com |